Sauvage's claim is that deep tech means atoms, not bits (innovation down at the material-science level, with hardware and software as two sides of one coin), and that it only earns its keep when it becomes profitable, because unprofitable technology cannot scale. From that first principle follows the contrarian move: back what is not yet obvious, roughly two years early, before consensus prices it in. AutoFlight went in during 2020 when air taxis sounded like science fiction; Ascend Elements was ten people; AM Batteries was two part-time professors. The sharper argument is about geopolitics. The fund deliberately models both a frictionless world and a fragmenting one, and Sauvage's conclusion is that friction acts as a subsidy: when rare materials get stuck behind tariffs, Challenger technologies (sodium-ion storage, copper and platinum-group recycling, green hydrogen, eventually nuclear fusion) finally get an opening against cheap incumbents. India sits in the middle of that. Its engineering brand power now stays home instead of emigrating, its temperature range makes sodium-ion interesting, and the global South's catch-up, which he concedes is unfair, is precisely where a profitable green technology could make India a powerhouse. What is missing is the exit: the hard-tech success story that would trigger the snowball SaaS already got. Three India investments in, an 88-year-old cassette company's venture arm is betting it arrives.
Worth your time if you are
Scientists sitting on a technology that isn't profitable yet
Deep-tech founders choosing between a grant and a term sheet
Climate and energy investors mapping post-lithium storage
Corporate strategy teams weighing an India venture arm